Constructive suffering the life-care way Boomer defined.

If I am willing to talk about pain, it does not mean I am some kind of masochist, on the contrary, I see absolutely no virtue whatsoever in un-constructive tension headaches. 

Un-constructive tension headaches rather are something that ought to be gotten rid of. 

About over 40 years ago Freud’s theories first filtered down to Intelligentsias and like out of the bible during mosses, privatized Pharisees misinterpreted – as so often happens – having learned guilt feelings have something to do with neurosis resolved that they were going to raise guilt-free employment enabled through select unethical law group enrichment.

What an awful thing to try to do under the law allows – raise specialized unconscionable mercenary profiteers legally sanctioned. 

A certain amount of under God existential guilt is required if we hope to remain worldly respected. 

Without it greed based leadership impedes evolution having cast all else back into the desert till?

Should national status quo go down the drain due to handfuls of money addicts? 

We owe all veterans still with us or not more than this. 

Back to fundamentals is solution that tells all - efforts in sacrifice were not in vein as unified nation under god and community covenant. 

Leaders may want to refresh themselves within simple concepts of albeit rule before signing legislations.

Is agenda proposal genuine in need or neurotic wants serving otherwise? 

Though time is money and money is time- irregardless – officials (primarily) public fund compensated are dually sworn (fiduciary) stewards of the people for the people in community covenant under god. 

If one were to take the time to read their Bible which sociology repeats same common denominators (elitist/titlists) cast upon systems that created woes of great depression proportions that toppled empires all primarily were further encouraged utilizing readers in law that  specialize within greed misinterprets contrary under God commonly known today as licensed bar Lawyer. 

Another-words – never sanction more devils that can be easily put down. 

Evidenced minority trends in unsavoriness from Life-care way perspective topically will fundamentally theorize “Fake it to make it” greed addiction offering suggestions in order to stay anonymous.  

Again, early jurisdiction recognition from the get go will always will be your best overall offensive/defense, not all are well suited to further dance with devils. 

Courage is the mature capacity to go ahead in spite of fears or pains within that do not meet their demands.

As Richard Bach wrote in Illusions more or less – key in and debate all integral limitations of responsibility as investigative opportunity to see if verifiable meets advertisements in claims. 

The Vietnam War still serves as best known militant ignorance on a grand scale. 

Despite all that is guardianship system known to be contrary, some privatized owners still think they can system Vietnam style bargain their way out of fiduciary defeat while others refuse to see this? 

Oases in the Desert

Life-care {guardianship} taxpayer movement benefiting seniors whether anonymous or not (conceptional) grass root conscionable effort will demand legislative reform not specific to probate nor limited within privatized or county government accountability that unsoundly administers placing all undue community burdens back where they belong allowing families to remain happy, joyous, and free under god as constitutionally intended and strict observances within bills of rights and declarations 

In- living trusts. 

2k and up in consumer vested legal papers (up to date) should reasonably hold system observance and if not why are licensees allowed to issue worthless none corporate protection documents offering no real safeguards that probate does not recognize? 

Above is just a little taste of what to expect hides under the sand that untimely negatively impact destinies.

I write holding valid protests; when scenarios become over zealot in complexities corruption up to criminal contentions are never very far behind in which justice is generally swift beginning 12/2014 in living trust declared no probate and malignantly compromised up to unthinkable and then some? 

If you had been following throughout the years prior to recent court ordered evidence awareness restrictions - you would know within hold consistent waters as one of integrity forced in family honor to journey further into the dessert and beyond yet still remain knowing no one earthly will ever sing for me. 

As did poet T.S. Elliot moderately live within ultimate civilized world I as well enjoyed in sameness up until 2012 P 893 guardianship in which cast me into repeated states of spiritual ward wastelands while attempting to preserve some sort of reasonable existence for my mother. 

Since 2012  I have had to deal within a great deal of aridity and despair  benefiting my mother repeated incident at a time seeing little patches of green, little hints of vegetation, images of water, yet to this day shadows of unconscionable still lurks under rocks. 

The solace here is one can survive toward greater riches when not done for Self-Centered Reasoning’s seeking quick easy fixes. 

The most healing thing I can do rather than try to get rid of accumulated undue inner pain is to sit here willing to share in the hopes no other will be made to endure as example you don’t have sell yourself out in order to live well and allow no other to write your Epitaph. 

  

The more consciousness one holds- the easier Sin games played become identifiable while manipulations violating rights reveals true devil’s advocate hiding within all along. 

When spiritually graced amazing things happen within – the more pain willing to be taken on the more joy potential you begin to feel and this is truly good news burdens and sorrows do not have final say in what makes journeys ultimately so worthwhile in faith- little engine will eventually get over the hill. 

The only effort ever wasted is the one not done. 

So if you don’t see any additional blog tutorials beginning June 01, 2016 - that means I have been placed on county vacation till? 

FAIRNESS REQUIRES THAT THE SAME LOGIC AND LAW BE USED IN CASES THAT HAVE SIMILAR FACTS.

EACH INDIVIDUAL ELEMENT OF THE LAW MUST MATCH WITHIN ELEMENT OF THE FACTS IN ORDER FOR THE LAW TO BE SAID TO APPLY.

Situational reference material:

The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system

Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.

Further Along the Road Less Traveled. 

Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology

Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice. 

Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.

No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.

We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Greens enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity while benefiting another out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth. 

Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s. 

Flight of the Life-care movement Phoenix.

Conflicts of in-living trust estate interests versus Professional –appointee –elect – judgments.

A conflict of interest exists whenever the attorney, or any person represented by attorney, has interest adverse in any way to the advice or course of action which should be available to the present client. 

A conflict exists whenever this tension exists – even if the attorney eventually takes the course of action most beneficial to the present client as steward of theoretical client In- living trust. 

In our initial grass root effort ethics query probe we publicly initiate argument of group firm judgment within controversy environment properness not specific to 2012 P 893 or to be limited in 2015 P 888.

We contend existence of lacks in definition guidance-best served to lead both trust cases astray to be subsequent within but not limited to - plugged into situational context for profit representation holds divided loyalty. 

Guarding the guardian/trustee

Your client a court appointed guardian requests of retained law group holding duel trust fiduciary role annual probate accountings filed to the court though signed under oath document lacks preparation date plus notary seal excusing required trust substantiating exhibits to be proper under conflict of interest professional judgment from ARDC standards? 

Publicly for the record within 2012 P 893 in which all primarily based upon specific to while not to be limited within subsequent 2015 P 888 serving as overall illusionary silencer/exoneration of all affairs. 

Looking out for number one “fiducially” lye all within “declarations” In-Living trust as ethical stewards that supersede all includes special interests! 

For public record:  trust malignantly compromised - all primary declarations ignored- inheritance preceding’s suggestively best represent combatant defiance hold prejudiced recognition bias in no validity otherwise unless within and why I write as community (safety )public service. 

Under God best translated “Holly Conjunction” conduct or more commonly referred to as Integrity within. It envisions profit can obtained which are ethnical as well within social justice!

Instead of either/or style of Mentation, we push for both/ and thinking. 

It does not rid reason, but promotes Reason Plus and Wisdom based within fiduciary love. 

Integration does not mean squashing two or more things together into colorless, unisex blob. 

The holy conjunction is the conjunction of INTEGRITY in all affairs.

To be ethical under god brings up conflict within licensure responsibleness neither specific to In –Living trust nor duty limited in ambassador/officer of the court in retrospect to ARDC rules within doing justice against retention wishes.  

In retrospect (topically) Illinois is (publicly) properness questioned for the record in community concern within precedent of multi retention group firm allowances stemming from representation of Dupage county Senior services as prosecutor to appointed guardianship now passage trustee? 

We further publicly question on behalf of tax payers in concern state responsibleness in retrospect holding documented submission in complaint lacks within attorney general’s office concern within potentials from senior public safety standpoints of fraud consortium remaining unmonitored? 

We further question 18^th judicial suspicioned improperness in taxpayers concern to uphold senior public safety in valid retrospect’s within Dupage county district attorney referrals recommending necessity of investigation. 

So far guardian/trustee in excuse holding In-living trust protests in objection; are primarily scarcely based upon familiarities justify retentions which bring up furthered valid suspicions in concern not specific to nor limited within; illegal group monopolization of trust asset hold invalid beneficial contentions that are contrary in retrospect within original owner decreed declarations that are to revert back while sidestepping  additional un-amendable dynamics such as none disbursement of trustee received designated  life Insurance proceed  effective December 2014. 

Fundamentally before federal escalate - state consciousness within senior system safeties under Life-Care reform grass root movement are publicly competence questioned in overall concern in administrative ability toward ensuring better tomorrow’s in retrospect which holds only one sworn oath true uphold answer to be under God and community covenants or pseudo otherwise for all boomers to judge further residency by and if not practical – whom, what, and where holds predatorily contentions best distanced preserving free will and right of choice. 

Situational brief references embodied in article review material:

Ethics and The Legal Profession – second edition

Edited by Elliot D. Coben & Michael Davis with Frederick A. Elliston

The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system

Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.

The Road Less Traveled and Beyond – Spiritual Growth in as Age of Anxiety.

Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology

Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice. 

Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.

No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.

We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Green along with edited by enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity while benefiting another out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth. 

Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s. 

Inquisitions of approaching retirement generations wealth is gold rush of new millennium.

Illinois requires licensee and appointee disciplinary jurisdictions updated as well as senior financial misconduct expanded to include privatized provider businesses entities. 

Pointing out predatory system misconducts within misapplication or otherwise has become the problem in which further boomer generational solvency is at stake requiring action. 

When Boomers remain oblivious they not only further enable bad conduct but become part of the problem as well. 

We need to draw up current analogies within Entity discipline laws (probate affairs) to the federal regulation of corporate/judicial crimes suggesting practice entities become subject to further discipline not just for collective monitoring failures, but vicariously for misconduct of individuals working within them, even when complaints and disciplinary authorities could not show exactly just which entity misbehaved eliminating individualized scapegoating while cost effectively maximizing detection while increasing U.S sentencing commission offender efficiency  under proposed Life- care act. 

What problem sets will generational Life-care movement focus upon benefiting selves, family and future generations? 

• Addresses: Unbridled -SLICK SLIP UP incivility. 
• Disputes: False Answers under minding good cause.
• Questions: This Fee equates to unspoken no. 
• Demands: the need for updated Moral Critique in the legal profession. 
• Suggests: senior perspective challenges within traditional conception. 
• Clarifies: ratifications within Utilitarian explanation
• Solves: senior voting community problems in concern by updating civility inclusion rules.  
• Unifies: seniors, lawyer- friendship, and probate justice out from under self-serving back to community builders under God and country. 

As slated Twain’D - proverbial lab rat; never underestimate the power behind myth scarcities shadow.

Carl Jung ascribed the root of human evil to “The Refusal to meet the Shadow.” 

By “The shadow,” Jung meant parts of minds that would rather not own up to, that are continually trying to hide from others and sweep under the rug of our consciousness. 

Most of us when pushed up against the wall by evidences of shadow sin (precedents - 2012 P 893) failures and imperfections will acknowledge own shadow. 

By the use of the word “Refusal,” Jung implies something far more active. 

Entities that have crossed over the line that separates sin from Evil are characterized most by their Absolute refusal to tolerate a sense of their own sinfulness.

This is because their central defect is not that they have no conscious but they refuse to bears its pain. 

Another-words, it is not the sin itself but the refusal to acknowledge that makes it eviL. 

The briefest definition within any civil professional unwillingness in most respects is; “Militant Ignorance,” of their own destructive shadow in which evil was committed. 

It’s not pleasant for any entity to face being contraire under God and country as lazy, self-centered being  that rather routinely Betray even its own best interests.

Yet, unless morally insane, paradox of personal failure under god in which we stand has time proven to be the greatest blessing possessed.

If our forefathers had not grasped “the gift of appropriate unpleasant guilt” keeping sins from getting out of hand while safeguarding our own proclivity would we not just be another third world melting pot regime? 

Luckily this did not happen and majority does possess safeguards that can be enforced against minority (Cell) greed based psychological think tanks spreading illness abroad or communities reversed shadow to recon within. 

Becoming more conscious avoids evils lurking around in depths of minds and is that simple when applied daily. 

To become conscious; basically requires chronological disorders identified that unhealthily walk around thrusting upon community while jeopardizing overall safety under misinterpretations within what the law allows. 

The best measure of (entity) oriented consciousness degrees are found by Consistencies- general approach to thinking- that even under secularism can never be both: unethical (pseudo) simplistic or moral (integral) Community builder? 

In this way, thinking and consciousness are inextricably locked together in a parallel relationship. 

Consciousness is fundamental foundation of all thinking, and thinking is the foundation of all consciousness. 

Anytime there is a failure in thinking, there are correspondent entities deficit in levels of consciousness thus all behavioral conduct the good, the bad, and the indifferent – is determined by the extent, or lack therefor, of the quality of thinking and consciousness inefficiency involved. 

Greater consciousness requires prerequisites of mental health before one demonstrates competence.

Our general opinion question of court in public approval: does Plaintiff contention under title verification under oath to be one requiring court ordered public Guardianship for my own good hold water and does financial concern hold arterial motive intent to defraud while further eluding justice in contention? 

Healthy conscious recognition observes consistent code in all affairs; once (shame on me) - twice (Shame on You) Third (final warning) and fourth DEFENDS. 

Situational brief references embodied in article review material:

Ethics and The Legal Profession – second edition

Edited by Elliot D. Coben & Michael Davis with Frederick A. Elliston

The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system

Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.

The Road Less Traveled and Beyond – Spiritual Growth in as Age of Anxiety.

Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology

Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice. 

Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.

No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.

We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Green along with edited by enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity while benefiting another out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth. 

Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s.  

What makes up a grass root Life-Care movement benefitting community?

Having due cause requires three elements needed.

• A Problem.
• A loss.
• A law.

IF you are missing any one of these three things, you don’t have a case, even if the other parts are very strong. Let’s take a closer Look at each of these elements. 

A Problem

You need a problem that is either an ongoing problem or has already happened. 

The law does not provide solutions to potential problems that may or may not happen in the future, except when there’s evidence that the potential Future Problem is part of a “Current Dispute.”

A Loss

You need to have suffered a “LOSS” or been “HURT” somehow.

This is called “HAVING DAMAGES,” If you haven’t been hurt or “LOST” something like “MONEY,” you have no case. 

A LAW

There needs to be a Law of some sort that says that the kind of damage you suffered is something where the law allows for a “Fiduciary” remedy such as “Declaration” IN Living Trust which remain personal to original owner and are to revert back. 

In other words, if there is a problem and you have been damaged due to a problem, there has to be a law that addresses that problem. 

Once you’ve got these three things, you need to take one more step to ensure you have a good case: You need to make sure the facts of the situation meet the requirements of the law that provide for Recovery for sort of problem incurred. 

A lawyer is supposed to analyze your problem by “breaking it down” within relevant Law into its Smallest parts, called “ELEMENTS” and apply your facts to each element in which corruption is another element we will address later down storyline. 

If all the facts don’t match up with all the elements of the law, there is no case under “THAT” Law. 

IT is important to know that when the facts change, so does whether or not there’s a Case under “THAT” Law.  

That is why it is so important to provide your lawyer with all documented Truths to include the minutest detail before engagement!

It is well advised to take notes while highlighting all finer points in oral conversations followed by recap letter or email; you will be glad you did when hearsay as notorious trick of trade comes into play!

If you have plenty of time on your hands, you might be willing to let a case Play out over a Long Period of time. 

WHAT DO YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE? 

It should be easy to say what you want to achieve, you want to solve the problem that brought you to court in the First Place! 

IN reality that may not be the only Goal one may have; you may see yourself as a champion of justice utilizing jerks that placed you in Lousy Position in the first Place. 

The better one is to be totally honest with self in retrospect toward Goals the better one will be able to make a decision about how and when to end it. 

What constitutes FRIVOLOUS

PROFESSIONAL ETHICAL LAWYERS SEE “WHINING AS PART OF HUMAN NATURE!” 

For a Law Group associate to classify as Frivolous, the following conditions must be met. 

• THERE IS NO ‘LAW’ THAT SUPPORTS MAKING THIS A LAWSUIT.
• FACTS DON’T FIT UNDER THE LAW ALLOWS WHAT ONE COULD CLAIM TO SUE UNDER.
• THE ONLY MOTIVE FOR SUIT IS TO EMBARRASS OR HARASS THE DEFENDANT. 

For attorneys to be told by a judge that an argument or case is Frivolous is a complete Humiliation. 

The attorney is basically being told that they have no idea what they’re doing? 

The legal community in any area, no matter how big it seems, is still a relatively small group. 

Lawyers know each other, or know someone who knows someone. 

When a Lawyer Messes up, the rest of the Legal Community finds out quickly, even if they weren’t there. This alone should consciously deter like bringing up a frivolous medical contention in concern? 

What elements suggest frivolous contentions hold fundamental criminal thinking? 

Research on Criminal Thinking underscores the most common patterns of Irrational Thought that lead to Disordered Decisions. 

Most Criminal thinking patterns are not so much convoluted as Simplistic and One-Dimensional. 

Individuals who think this way do not take responsibility for their choices they lack perspective about time, which primarily solely exists in the present without investing in the future or taking into accost consequences of actions. 

One aspect of Criminal Thinking pattern that stands out most because of its prevalence is Attitude of Ownership or what can be referred to as element of Entitlement. 

Medically Inherent in prospective is cockiness that borders ‘Blatant’ Narcissism. 

Those with extreme sense of “Entitlements” are able to “Justify” violating other People and Their Property without “REGARD” to their rights. 

If element “Inferiority” applies; entitled see themselves as helpless thus misapplication defend. 

Where to be of consortium elect; submissions discounts all “Failures” within demonstrating no further need to put in efforts required hold element of system abuse backed in probable corruption assurances perhaps Privileged accustomed too? 

Some may choose under sanctioned privilege to theoretically steal while manipulating others in beliefs system owes them? 

Desiring financial motivated successes is not the problem rather it is negligence within to recognize alternative ways that have become problematic when accompanied by unbridled willingness to violate others by Discrimination, Exploitation, and Oppression, denying same Rights, Opportunities, and Access to valued Resources.  

The common denominator behind most fundamental Criminal Thinking is tendency of failing subordinate to think well or within some owners as none fiduciary enabler - not consciously at all. 

Unless under congress declared war time environment - Integral ethics under the law allows by rule hold no known situational conduct in precedent or by otherwise that validate contrary under God in which all are based upon as unified nation. 

Elements under god maintain integrity in all dealings - that must be ethical in submission as well and yes my friend that is main precedent Rule.  

Do licenses though not written on licensees fall under conducts of unwritten code proportions; you bet your sweet bippy they do in promissory oath. 

Under God best translated “Holly Conjunction” conduct or more commonly referred to as Integrity within. It envisions profit can obtained which are ethnical as well within social justice!

Instead of either/or style of Mentation, we push for both/ and thinking. 

It does not rid reason, but promotes Reason Plus and Wisdom based within fiduciary love. 

Integration does not mean squashing two or more things together into colorless, unisex blob. 

The holy conjunction is the conjunction of INTEGRITY in all affairs. 

The lost art of civility ETHICS

Senior citizens live in solvency fears and rightfully so best resembling Vietnam era captors perspectives hold theoretical theologian destiny within motivational behaviors serving organizational mission unwritten behaviors demonstrating secular humanisms holding no life value and should be treated accordingly.  

How can I conclude, easily, enough Hipaa act hidden re-stitching’s of mothers right eyebrow disfigurements along with multiple concussions that noticeably function depilated within short intervals in time that lead to type B facility violation followed by eviction within one week out of violate and 10 more fiduciary negligence stitches reflective of (2012 P 893) ward choice excellence. 

Humanism demonstrates; neither rooted in civil fiduciary behavior nor necessitates recognition in Higher Power or Twain’D barbarism. 

In probate Illinois you will be required to live by theoretical war time ethics. 

If you are a senior and you either currently reside or are thinking of relocation we cannot speak for other states but here be prepared to serve as an entire Legal system within self. 

Your job description will include being healthy and whole, must possess within mind a competent defense attorney, a competent prosecuting attorney, and a good judge. 

Suggestive (Rigid) code ethics often have inhumane consequences, relocation within another states jurisdiction is not only highly probable, but practical while still can. 

Focus on End Result is what separates clerks from leaders that are not afraid to settle when it makes sense.

Civility in community counts heavily toward future wellbeing. 

A heathy none third world community communicates real community that sustains high qualities of authentic communications among its members. 

Community mission foundational teaches by example principles that are healthy and authentic. 

It recognizes a business that politely stabs people in backs as tacticians requiring correction. 

Community in need of (to be reborn) life-care act representation; holds voice within voter demand “CIVILITY REDISCOVERED?” that is consciously community motived while ethical in submission to a higher power. 

FAIRNESS REQUIRES THAT THE SAME LOGIC AND LAW BE USED IN CASES THAT HAVE SIMILAR FACTS.

EACH INDIVIDUAL ELEMENT OF THE LAW MUST MATCH WITH AN ELEMENT OF THE FACTS IN ORDER FOR THE LAW TO BE SAID TO APPLY.

Situational reference material:

The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system

Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.

The Road Less Traveled and Beyond – Spiritual Growth in as Age of Anxiety.

Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology

Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice. 

Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.

No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.

We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Greens enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity while benefiting another out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth. 

Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s.  

I formally protest all hidden agendas holding extreme prejudices in objections.

May 18, 2016

Greetings to all, 

Truths fullness is finder of facts agenda sought: so far for the record communicational and recognition wise several areas hold blatant element deficits that do not meet standards not limited to special needs trust agreement nor specific within immediate case in front of bench holding declared bias (2012 P 893) precedent now by rule (discovery) in formal dispute as qualifier steps up court of appeals process in request.  

IN addition I protest full disclosure fairness in all affairs noting extreme equality prejudice demonstrates neither specific to Annual accounting nor limited within equality objections holding precedent. 

Will the court of appeals hear my case? 

Trustee Demon Dance.

There are two ways a court of appeals hear cases: By “Right” and by leave. 

When an appeal is by right, it means you have an “AUTOMATIC” right to appeal.

You do not have to show anything special to get a review by the court of appeals.

All you have to do is follow proper procedure. 

Checking with representing attorney in retrospect within best option suites formal disagreement in rule concerning Special Needs trust is customary as well as REQUESTED FOR THE RECORD. 

Generally,  it is easier to have your case heard by Right rather than by leave, because as long as one follows the right procedure , the court has no choice; YOUR APPEAL HAS TO BE HEARD. 

Noting Pitfall for the record: 

Respondent does not want to have case that was originally appealable by right turn into one that can only be filed by leave. 

How does this happen; respondent or attorney misses a filing deadline which is not the position we are ever to be in, File on Time, Every time is request direct factoring in rules of discovery. 

Respondent formal protest objecting to special needs trust (record) dynamics satisfies appeals  1st element  in which precedent (2012 p 893) will serve as situational  2nd element qualifier consistent within up to (criminal) rights violates unifying 3rd element ; rule overturned - trust stricken.

In conclusion: standard discouragement response within “this will cost you” reference - holds no water when injustice administered; best not brought up is well advised within ARDC retrospect. 

As always: Fiducially under God never integrally cloaks and daggers discovery code while unethically administering cat and Mouse unwritten contract inquisition gamesmanship and why I write. 

Thank you,

Sincerely,

William Monks on behalf of self- deceased Mother and best interests of In-Living Trust.

Under the Law allows provides for one to travel under God as well.

All Licenses issued as well as bar oaths taken hold fiduciary communion element denominators must be ethical by submission as well under god in which all under our flag are primarily based upon and within. 

Medical element misapplications holding vantage contentions ethically never fall under traveling with god’s umbrella that is why the law provides disciplinary boards and commissions for this purpose. 

Tort Law: Personal Injury and Property damage. 

When people are hurt or their property is damaged, if falls under the area of law known as tort law. 

There are two kinds of Torts: Intentional, when the person intended the act that caused harm; and accidental, which is usually called Negligence. 

Negligence by definition: is when a person has a responsibility to pay attention and be careful in his actions but fails to do so  and causes an injury to another precedential within  2012 P 893.  

When one fact finds elements under rule observance they first examine integrity behind contention which establishes ethics being observed. 

Both Integral Symbols ask under which domain do we remain?

Are Elements in organizational behavior “Consciously Civility Motivated? That is “ETHICAL” as well?

Does contention within element hold inherent immoral values that are grossly unethically that subtly “Sidesteps” realities within holding pervasive organizational behavior of problematic proportions?

Would a second element from any fact finder source in perspective hold up to be “HUMANISTIC?”

By definition to be Humanistic demonstrates within consistency (2012 P 893) meaning having an attitude that people are “Precious” and should be treated “Fiducially “ accordingly as possible? 

Were to be expanded into third element; can such fall under criticism of “Secular Humanism?”

Would ambassador submissions from legal community standpoints well advise to become more Humanistic “themselves?”

If fact finder were to expand even further would submission distinctions reflect code ethics?    

Code ethics are derived from various Ethical prescriptions that have been utilized throughout History.

Such codes pronounce certain acts to be (Bad, Wrong, or Impermissible UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE!

Situational element “Tenet” basses that no Ethical (Judgments) can be made without consideration of all circumstances in which it occurs to include circumstances of element War Time and self-defense. 

To live by situational ethics, one must be able to demonstrate mental competence holds capacity to serve as entire legal system within self. 

To be medically perspective healthy, one must possess within own mind a “Competent” prosecuting attorney, and a good Judge. 

Plaintiffs holding character disorder tend to have a very strong internal defense attorney, but a very “WEAK “conscious or internal Prosecuting attorney.  

Those of “Neurosis” tend to have a very strong prosecuting attorney but a weak defense attorney (Probate) who is unable to speak up under code concerning client’s activities in retrospect  to behaviors demonstrating none existence of fiduciary formulas ethical by submission. 

While (plaintiff) Contentions may hold Judicial assignation theologies of necessity: element code ethically cannot discriminate against (Twain’D) Respondent) by code that states “Thou Shalt not Kill.” 

Or in conclusion my probate case: plaintiff necessities of respondent to be medically disenfranchised that are illusionary in nature hold blatant evidenced intent to elude justice under God now concerned beyond all reasonable doubt behind motion for court to compel within what legitimate financial institutions nor administrative trust agencies are willing to accept based not only by document value but trustee fiduciary performance as well in which I have extensively protested to the court in objection while further questioning statures.  

Today’s preceding order (outcome) either confirms or denies traveling under god that holds only one true answer prevalent of system all along beyond all preponderances in doubt? 

Situational reference material:

The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system. 

Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.

The Road Less Traveled and Beyond – Spiritual Growth in as Age of Anxiety.

Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology

Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice. 

Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.

No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.

We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Greens enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity while benefiting another out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth. 

Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s.  

What elements in Law have not been relatively applied to Special needs trust holding contrary plaintiff contentions?

First we must examine how it is to be applied.

The court must decide which statutes and precedents apply to case in front of it, and the finder of facts has decided what the facts are, the statutes and precedents have to be applied to the facts. 

This is done step by step, and is actually pretty straight forward yet in my case procedurally many plaintiff points lack standard of proof are being overlooked  consistent within 2012 P 893 while refusing to acknowledge respondent  probative proffering’s evidence  otherwise within original claim in concern. 

Every statute and every rule of law in a case can be broken down into its most basic parts or steps, which are called “Elements.”

The Plaintiff must prove each element of the rule of law for inability. 

The fact-finder applies the rule to the facts of the situation by incorporating the elements with the facts.

At each element, the facts must fit the statement of element.

If one element doesn’t fit the facts, the plaintiff loses.

For example, the fact finder may find that the plaintiff had a Fiduciary duty, so the first element is not “Satisfied” or “Met.” The fact finder then turns to the second Element, whether Plaintiff breached or violated their duty to administer carefully. If the finder of fact decided that the administrator was careless, then the court must find that the second Element is not satisfied.

But, if the finder of facts decides the respondent did, in fact, administer carefully, the court must find that the second element is satisfied, and the plaintiff loses. 

The same thing happens with the Third Element. Was plaintiff agent administrative carelessness the cause for motion in concern? If it was then the third element isn’t met, and the plaintiff loses. 

At each point, even if one element is not met nor satisfied plaintiff verification under oath isn’t met nor satisfied, the plaintiff loses her case. 

The last element due process must mesh with the facts, too. 

Did plaintiff have a duty to administer responsibly, did agent falsely motion respondent as Whitewash within duel fiduciary irresponsibleness and due to improperness was respondent injured as direct result of negligence is a two part decision which fact finder must determine and apply. 

There are several reasons that this part of the Decision-making process seems so much like a Black Box. First, most people don’t know all the elements of the rule of law is going in. 

That is why we hire or in living trust appropriate Lawyers – to find out what law is likely to apply to a particular problem.

Second, if the law in question is complex, and especially if the facts are complicated, too, keeping all the “ELEMENTS STRAIGHT” and figuring out how they’ll apply is very difficult, EVEN FOR EXPERTS!

Most of all, no one knows what the fact finder has decided is “TRUE” ABOUT THE EVIDENCE UNTIL AFTER THE DECISION IS GIVEN BY THE COURT. 

Going in you don’t know the facts as decided by the finder of fact. 

All that is known from respondent perspective is evidences should be believed!

Again, and unfortunately, nothing can guarantee that your side will be believed.

Not knowing what the facts “REALLY” are according to the finder of facts makes it seem that the process of applying the Law is very mysterious. 

However, if you come at it backward, once decisions are made, and accept (even if only for the sake of argument that the findings of facts are the basis of decision, IT’S USUALLY VERY SIMPLE TO SEE HOW THE LAW IS BEING APPLIED. 

Take each fact as found by the Finder of Fact, and match it to the Element of Rule of Law That it supports. 

IF YOU CAN’T MAKE A GOOD MATCH THAT MEANS THE LAW WAS IMPROPERLY APPLIED, AND YOU’VE GOT GOOD ISSUES TO NOT ONLY APPEAL CASE, BUT PUT UP IN COMPLAINT BEFORE JUDICIAL STATE REVIEW BOARD. 

CONSISTENCY FROM CASE TO CASE

One of the most important factors in coming to a decision in any case is making sure decisions within are consistent with precedent of 2012 P 893. 

Judges can move away from precedent legitimately if they can show that the facts in the case before the court are too different than the case claimed as precedent for the same rule apply in the same way. However is the facts aren’t that different, or if it’s not logical to use a particular precedent in deciding case, as stated previously, there are good issues for appeal and ethics review. 

Judges notoriously dislike appeals, and particularly dislike being told by the appeals court or commissions that they were wrong. 

Knowing this should give real motivation to apply the law correctly to the facts FIRST TIME AROUND so they are not embarrassed in front of the entire Legal Community by a successful appeal or disciplinary action. 

Consistency from case to case in applying the rule of Law from Precedents and “STATUTES” ARE CRITICAL TO JUDGES SUCCESS RATE, every case decision occasionally changed or overturned now and them is normal; its only when a large percentage of Judges cases are overturned that judge starts to look either incompetent or problematic. 

How are final decisions actually made?

Whether the final decision is made by a Judge or Jury, same processes are used. 

If there is no jury, the judge just applies each element of the rule of Law to the Facts According to the “STATUTE” or case being followed. 

Once the facts have been matched up with the rules , the Judge is to look to see (WHETHER THERE ARE ANY ELEMENTS OF THE RULES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN MET.

IF THERE ARE ELEMENTS THAT HAVEN’T BEEN MET, THEN THE PLAINTIFF LOSES!

IN A NONJURY PROVERBIAL BENCH TRAIL, THE JUDGE MAY WRITE A SORT OF ESSAY CALLED AN “OPINION” STATING WHO WON OR LOST AND WHY.

FAIRNESS REQUIRES THAT THE SAME LOGIC AND LAW BE USED IN CASES THAT HAVE SIMILAR FACTS.

EACH INDIVIDUAL ELEMENT OF THE LAW MUST MATCH WITH AN ELEMENT OF THE FACTS IN ORDER FOR THE LAW TO BE SAID TO APPLY. 

Situational reference material: The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system. 

Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.

Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice. 

Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.

No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.

We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Greens enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices  while preserving community integrity benefiting another from territories in Hell.

Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for when all for the right reasons.