Monday, May 16, 2016

Under the Law allows provides for one to travel under God as well.


All Licenses issued as well as bar oaths taken hold fiduciary communion element denominators must be ethical by submission as well under god in which all under our flag are primarily based upon and within. 
Medical element misapplications holding vantage contentions ethically never fall under traveling with god’s umbrella that is why the law provides disciplinary boards and commissions for this purpose. 
Tort Law: Personal Injury and Property damage. 
When people are hurt or their property is damaged, if falls under the area of law known as tort law. 
There are two kinds of Torts: Intentional, when the person intended the act that caused harm; and accidental, which is usually called Negligence. 
Negligence by definition: is when a person has a responsibility to pay attention and be careful in his actions but fails to do so  and causes an injury to another precedential within  2012 P 893.  

When one fact finds elements under rule observance they first examine integrity behind contention which establishes ethics being observed. 


Both Integral Symbols ask under which domain do we remain?


Are Elements in organizational behavior “Consciously Civility Motivated? That is “ETHICAL” as well?
Does contention within element hold inherent immoral values that are grossly unethically that subtly “Sidesteps” realities within holding pervasive organizational behavior of problematic proportions?
Would a second element from any fact finder source in perspective hold up to be “HUMANISTIC?”
By definition to be Humanistic demonstrates within consistency (2012 P 893) meaning having an attitude that people are “Precious” and should be treated “Fiducially “ accordingly as possible? 

Were to be expanded into third element; can such fall under criticism of “Secular Humanism?”
Would ambassador submissions from legal community standpoints well advise to become more Humanistic “themselves?”

If fact finder were to expand even further would submission distinctions reflect code ethics?    
Code ethics are derived from various Ethical prescriptions that have been utilized throughout History.
Such codes pronounce certain acts to be (Bad, Wrong, or Impermissible UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE!
Situational element “Tenet” basses that no Ethical (Judgments) can be made without consideration of all circumstances in which it occurs to include circumstances of element War Time and self-defense. 

To live by situational ethics, one must be able to demonstrate mental competence holds capacity to serve as entire legal system within self. 
To be medically perspective healthy, one must possess within own mind a “Competent” prosecuting attorney, and a good Judge. 
Plaintiffs holding character disorder tend to have a very strong internal defense attorney, but a very “WEAK “conscious or internal Prosecuting attorney.  
Those of “Neurosis” tend to have a very strong prosecuting attorney but a weak defense attorney (Probate) who is unable to speak up under code concerning client’s activities in retrospect  to behaviors demonstrating none existence of fiduciary formulas ethical by submission. 
While (plaintiff) Contentions may hold Judicial assignation theologies of necessity: element code ethically cannot discriminate against (Twain’D) Respondent) by code that states “Thou Shalt not Kill.” 
Or in conclusion my probate case: plaintiff necessities of respondent to be medically disenfranchised that are illusionary in nature hold blatant evidenced intent to elude justice under God now concerned beyond all reasonable doubt behind motion for court to compel within what legitimate financial institutions nor administrative trust agencies are willing to accept based not only by document value but trustee fiduciary performance as well in which I have extensively protested to the court in objection while further questioning statures.  
Today’s preceding order (outcome) either confirms or denies traveling under god that holds only one true answer prevalent of system all along beyond all preponderances in doubt? 

Situational reference material:
The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system. 
Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.
The Road Less Traveled and Beyond – Spiritual Growth in as Age of Anxiety.
Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology



Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice. 
Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.
No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.
We thank Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms along with Victoria Greens enrichments enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity while benefiting another out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth. 
Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s.  

No comments:

Post a Comment