When is enough- enough under God that does not unconstitutionally betray taxpayers and country?
Morality unified under God is integral by submission while ethical by application is what makes our world go round - not monetary byproduct politics.
Situational law primarily discounts elements toward vantage points, go into any law office and you will see shelves full of books holding tombs in precedents but to every negative aspect there is a positive element called ethics that balances all back under God in which are justice system is all about.
Due to pseudo theologies (money is time) backed by natural human tendencies toward profit laziness many licensees like mule to water - flock to specialized teachers in law that seek out all domineering precedents in which reversed situational justice is of no matter within element contention by which any integral court alone minus commission having raised to many specialized devils can ever hope to overcome.
We are neither by no means condemning whole systems nor professions, rather we are pointing out bad apples reputational’y spoil whole group’s public approval imagery and why privatized Guardianships must be placed under state codes of professional conduct jurisdiction equipped to rehabilitate up to case within case element.
Again, when things get out of hand - jeopardizing senior public safety - under god goes back to fundamentals that provide rehabilitation for lost sheep while weeding out malignant dissident strays.
ETHICS
There are two general approaches to teaching “Legal Ethics” - “Professional Integrity” – “Lawyer Professionalism” or “The Professional Responsibility of Lawyers” (all of these terms name the same subject more or less): the legal (or compliance) and the ‘ETHICAL’ (or Philosophical).
The Legal approach asks, “What must a Lawyer do to stay within the rules? How does a firm stay out of (serious) Trouble?
The legal approach treats the ABA’s MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT as just another statute or regulation, a constraint others have imposed as a condition of practicing law, or a close relative of the Criminal Law or, at least, OF CONSUMER PROTECTION (such as truth-In –lending law in which topically life-care movement seeks Truth in guardianship of person and assets).
Naturally, a “RATIONAL” Guardianship would want to know how close privatized can get to the limits without getting on the wrong side of it.
The ETHICAL approach, in contrast, asks, “WHAT MUST A PERSON DO TO BE BOTH A GOOD LAWYER AND GOOD PERSON?
HOW SHOULD A LAWYER CONTIBUTE TO ‘THE PRACTICE OF LAW’?
The Ethical approach treats the MODEL RULES as a standard Voluntary (that is why ARDC exists for this purpose) accepted TO ACHIVE A PURPOSE THAT ALL LAWYERS SHARE, EARNING A LIVING IN IN A “MORALLY” PRAISEWORTHY WAY AND WHY ILLINOIS TOPICAL FIRM ETHICS REVIEWS REQUIRE REHABILITATION AS WELL. Lawyering is to be a “Nobel Undertaking.”
Life- care movement models ambassadors’ advocacy after any good lawyer within ethical community standing being one should aim for the Targets Center (to be as good a lawyer as one can be) not the targets edge (TO BE AS POOR AS ONE CAN GET AWAY WITH BEING).
While most books target legal only (money is time conduct) texts exist from the ethical approach that incorporate both together under God in which we stand.
A modern Romans of Biblical proportion as nothing new under the sun remains as Language manipulation Arena of play in which primarily opposing statesmen dialogue for superiority in rulings.
That is why we have public records; they compass sociological trends best community rehabilitated.
Local Governmental (fiducially) holds protective equality responsibleness toward disabled seniors as well from assorted licensed predator organizations running contrary under God in country ethics.
A.A.R.P is a wonderful source from senior friendly standpoints in which to best judge for selves which states topically misbehave the most best avoided.
I am confident that even Gomer Pyle himself totally comprehends Life- care movement within any national senior survey extends no favorable endorsement within state demonstrates suggestively compass none rehab ability status pinioned requiring federal intervention by mandates till willing to become senior integral Show me State in nation that consciously observes in all affairs.
Legal ethics (in good faith) is not a mere side-constraint in practice of law itself compasses technical manipulations of language; legal ethics is essential to understanding what law groups do, not as theoretical knowledge, language game or mere occupation, but what truths lie behind profession.
Though rules are important submission must be competently ethical as well within interprets attempt to serve certain “MORAL” ideal (justice within the bounds of the law) in a morally permissible way.
Movement can find nowhere within rules or otherwise that validate unethical criminal based thinking within violates of rights that Discriminate, Exploit, Oppress that denies same rights, opportunities, and access to valued sources nor intellectual bigotry that dismiss the undereducated, underprivileged and mentally ill populists.
Integrity under God in covenant recognizes there are reasoning’s behind everything that should be naturally further pursued dismissing (drama) that ethically conflict within elements of valid argument.
Interrogatories
They are written questions in concern that are only given to parties involved within case.
Any question can be asked if it could lead to information that may be important to case.
Interrogatories usually start with a query aimed at identifying in concern such as fiduciary that have to do with case that can go into tremendous Detail.
Usually there are only one set of interrogates sent per topical preceding in front of that can be further question sent based upon answers in the original interrogatory.
That usually does not matter; there is a difference between questions and information that can be asked during proceedings.
In discovery there is much more room to ask questions to see where they go.
Always be aware and point out questionable areas in concern to your resolution expert attorney requesting rules within comprehensively defined concerning right of.
Testimony evidence is of great importance during proceeding; make sure you have a plan in place concerning sudden information not given from the other side.
During oral interpretive preceding environment - presentation carries weight that makes or breaks.
Regardless of how classified under same rule applies.
The information must help Prove or Disprove a fact in element, and the fact of has to be connected to something that parties are actually arguing about.
Its worth rests on how “Believable”, or “CREDIBLE”, the testimony given appears to the judge.
The finder of facts must decide how believable the testimony evidence is.
Credible by definition: Evidence is ‘Trustworthy’ and believable by fact the finder of fact, which may be judge or jury.
Demonstrative precedent integrated within interrogatory theory.
Evidence ethically can be presented through documentations that show something is true.
There is a rule called “Best Evidenced” rule, which states that the “BEST”, most acceptable (appears none altered) evidence available within why you are there in which character counts within element rules.
Evidences require two main requirements met: the evidence is relevant to the proceeding, the evidence is reliable. This is done by “laying a foundation” or Preferring.
Relevance by definition is the state of having a direct relationship to the matter at hand.
A character precedent can ethically meet elements within relevancies that are obvious.
Attorneys are famous for slipping in elements that are not relevant in the hopes that will help sway the court.
If you cannot find some way to claim that the “Evidence will help the court” answer a question between the parties, the evidence can be considered.
Foundation
Showing that “Evidence is credible or Believable” starts with person alleged testifying has direct knowledge of what testifying to, or inanimate object being testified to in claim or laying foundation.
Law schools classes (in which we in – living trust publicly allege all proceeding’s hold disillusions within to have been overlooked while shortchanged) by “Brick by Brick” analogy (Warranted within dynamics hold preponderances of) why evidences show why claim in concern holds misapplication intent that apply within all arguments in front of nor to be limited within Ineffective assistance of council reserved.
Conversely, one of the things that “Characterize” the most “MENTALLY” healthy among us is there great taste for mystery and their profound curiosity.
Some unfortunately for unconscionable reasons lie ethically dormant when called upon as finders of facts to further travel within the obvious pertaining toward engineered inner space star trek Klingons.
This is why taxpayers fiducially fund commissions for this purpose under covenants in community safety.
Again, another valid ethical argument within life –Care rehabilitation movements call for Privatized Guardianships of person and assets augmented within state codes of Profession conduct best suited to discipline case within case alternate perspectives that commonly more often than most suggests bias apathy holding no place within community under God.
In conclusion reality, like God, is something that can only be approached.
These words from Albert Einstein best sum up what May 31, 2016 holds for me in which I expect none of the above will apply well document precedence in all In Living Trust affairs placing monetary over integral - ethical law observance.
Though I most likely will be slaughtered by Order within proverbial Venus Flytrap only court allotted two week to overcome all combined obstacles as result of Ineffective assistance of counsel this poem pretty much sums up what all Twain’D will encounter when summoned into secret social arena requiring exonerations saving faces within plaintiff or otherwise specific to broken agreement but not limited with state statute in order violate stricken and furthered improperness of annual accounting within decanting of In-living Trust evidenced wrongfulness theoretically attempting to dump all imperiousness upon presumed to be of fiduciary integrity unsuspected another now up to 3rd contender as trustee to include blatant plaintiff violate within comment in agreement rules.
In our endeavor to understand reality we are somewhat like a Man trying to understand the mechanisms of a Closed Watch.
We see the face and the moving hands, even hear it ticking, but have no way of opening case.
If Ingenious may from some Picture of Mechanism which could be responsible for all that is observed, but may never be quite sure his Picture is the Only One That Can Explain his Observations.
He may never be able to compare his picture with the Real Mechanism and cannot imagine possibilities of the meaning of such a comparison.
So to all yah de-dah –de-da thinkers questioning what does this all mean: Simple - potential freedom to live out my life under god as intended within public demonstrate in abilities that trustee certified under oath otherwise to be mentally ill requiring guardianship falsehoods that even the blind can clearly see by respondent demonstrates clearly showing ability to think multi dimensionally while simultaneously utilizing both sides of brain rational which by any medical standards are not consistent within mental illness of concern requiring guardianship due to integral frankness In-Living Trust classify as illness while narcissistic narcissism holding unorthodox in contention does subject to criminal by submission that holds no business within executive authoritativeness nor credible through own imperiousness to condemn another due to bruised professional ego and hurt pride.
The gate of Eden is forever barred from us by cherubim’s with a flaming sword.
So in many ways we are both blessed and cursed by consciousness.
With it comes the awareness of realities in Good and Evil tyrannies of humanity.
Jung is accredited within translations for the masses, his reoccurred popularity has a great deal to do with publications presented at the right time just when gnawing’s in dissatisfactions are beginning to be felt relatively saying nothing really new exists under the sun just retitled.
FAIRNESS REQUIRES THAT THE SAME LOGIC AND LAW BE USED IN CASES THAT HAVE SIMILAR FACTS.
EACH INDIVIDUAL ELEMENT OF THE LAW MUST MATCH WITHIN ELEMENT OF THE FACTS IN ORDER FOR THE LAW TO BE SAID TO APPLY.
Situational reference materials:
Ethics and the legal profession – second edition
Edited by: Elliot D. Cohen & Michael Davis with Frederick A. Elliston
The complete IDIOT’S Guide to successfully navigate the complex civil court system
Author: Victoria E. Green, J.D.
Further Along the Road Less Traveled.
Author: M. Scott Peck, M.D in psychology
Not for profit-senior community service educational shares- promoting better awareness’s through effective communications ending Financial exploitation. You do have a voice and a choice.
Story line based upon updated references in real time perspective.
No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery share.
We thank all editors along with Dr. Peck for sharing his intuitive under God Lecture series and practice accrued wisdoms plus Victoria Greens enrichments adding perspective enabling another to fight the good fight against Greed based system Injustices preserving community integrity benefiting others out from under territories that lead into Hell on earth.
Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s.
No comments:
Post a Comment